Somewhere in this list of names is our next manager. John Collins’ lack of experience is said to concern the board, and rightly so. While he would presumably bring back a reversion to Tigana-esque passing patterns, could he win with this squad? It would be quite a gamble at a time where the board needs certainty, or as close to certainty as they can get. Which is why Venables starts to make sense. Whatever we might think of the man, he does understand football, how things need to be done, how to make the best of available resources. I’m no Venables fan, but for Fulham’s purposes he seems a sensible choice.
Roy Hodgson is another with a ‘tactician’ reputation, but he may find that our motley collection are not as malleable as he’d need them to be. Oh, there’s talent in the squad, but they have no confidence and are used to playing a certain way (directly, badly). Is he a strong enough personality to come in, reinvigourate these players, and turn things around? We cannot know, of course, but Venables has previous in this area, having rescued Bryan Robson’s Middlesbrough under similar circumstances in 2000. He hasn’t managed a club property in years, but desperate times call for desperate measures.
My prediction: Collins AND Venables.
Hi Rich
Merry Christmas to you and Brian; it’s been great ‘blogging’ alongside you in 2007…let’s hope we’re not recording our drop into the Championship eh?
Anyway, I just don’t believe that having any kind of power-sharing works. Maybe have someone like Venables to advise, but certainly none of this director of football nonsense. A manager needs to be in sole charge otherwise you risk problems like we had with Tigana and Baresi five years ago.
However, we need a premanent replacement in quickly as this team is going from bad to worse…
r33g
27 Dec 07 at 4:32 pm
so roy hodgson it is!
bruce
28 Dec 07 at 4:49 pm