Boxing Day. I had been feeling quite excited on the drive up, rolling around a Hilaire Belloc line in my mind (via Australian writer Gideon Haigh’s essay about Australian wicket keeper Adam Gilchrist): “Whatever happens, we have got/ Hangeland, and you have not”. I liked this, but on arrival at White Hart Lane I realised that I was very wrong: we did not have Hangeland. Panic. I had just put £5 on a 0-0 draw, taking advantage of silly 9-1 odds. (Had they not been paying attention? Fulham 9-1 for a 0-0 away from home?) I texted someone who might know: “Where’s Hangeland?” “Sold to Chelsea” “Not really, flu unfortunately” “! You evil man.”
Chris Baird stood in, which, if nothing else, would test the strength of Roy’s system: if we could keep a clean sheet at Spurs without Brede Hangeland then we must surely be on the right track. Adding to the intrigue, Jimmy Bullard was injured in the first half, and replaced by Dickson Etuhu. These two players – our best two players – are the subjects of much transfer speculation at the moment, so the remainder of the game would be a sneak preview of what life without them might be like.
It wasn’t too bad. Chris Baird, Hangeland’s replacement, had something of a stormer, charging down what seemed like a dozen shots, making some important tackles, and only once caught being clumsy. Well played, Chris Baird. Aaron Hughes beside him had an equally combative afternoon, and the pair of them can be proud of a fine backs to the wall performance.
The middle of the park was more of an issue, as Bullard’s removal did leave a bit of a hole. In some ways it worked to our advantage, as Etuhu’s heft was useful in repelling the second half onslaught, but if we’d managed to keep the ball for more than 20 seconds at a time (we didn’t) this onslaught may not have materialised in the first place. The stage was set for Simon Davies to take charge in there, but alas, it was not really his day. On the other flank Dempsey had a thunderous first half, testing Gomes with an acrobatic scissors kick, but he could not swim against the current in the second half; it really was tense stuff.
But as the minutes ticked on and the pressure mounted Fulham could – and perhaps should – have won the game. Andy Johnson was set free by Davies, but failed in his attempt to round Gomes, and the chance was lost. (Johnson has been spurned three one-on-one chances in the last couple of games). It was a difficult game for he and Zamora, but again they worked hard and battled for the team. We must appreciate this, but we must also hope that both can be a bit deadlier in the new year.
There are no such issues at the back, where Mark Schwarzer made one of the saves of the season early on, flipping a close range shot from Aaron Lennon wide when a goal seemed almost certain. He really is a player. As is this season’s most unheralded defender, Paul Konchesky, who had a terrific game against the chainsaw pace of Lennon. Lennon and Corluka were dynamic down the Spurs right, and Konchesky had to be at his best to keep them out. One tackle, throwing himself at Lennon’s feet inside the penalty area, was massively difficult and even more dangerous, but perfectly executed. Well done him, too.
And so a cold, cold game finished 0-0. I collected £50 from the Mansion Bookmaker’s window, at once delighted to have won some money and disappointed not to have had the courage of my convictions and stuck the whole £10 down in the first place. But that is greedy thinking, and I must be happy with my winnings, just as the team must be happy with their point. At the moment it really does feel as if we could hold Brazil to a 0-0 draw at the Maracana if given the opportunity. The absence of goals may not thrill our away supporters, but those points are mounting up.



I tried my hand at a report as well, but yours says largely the same things but with more precision. The only thing I would add is that I was impressed with Dempsey’s defensive work, especially in the second half.
Comment by Ilya — December 26, 2008 @ 6:49 pm |
feel free to post anyway, Ilya.
If anyone can access the BBC or Sky post match interviews I’d love to hear what Roy says. I’m on a slow dialup connection, so not possible to listen from here.
cheers
Rich
Comment by rich — December 26, 2008 @ 7:19 pm |
I got a bit frustrated towards the end. In stoppage time Nevland broke down the right-hand side in a great position to cross, and only Zamora (I think) was anywhere near the box when the ball came in. WHY?? It’s almost as if we’re not interested in the concept of scoring away from home. We’re in love with the 0-0.
That said, it’s true we did attack a bit more today than in our previous stalemates (albeit always slowly) and there were two big chances – Dempsey (brilliant) and Johnson (grr, stick that away!). Roy has us very well organised, as we know, and this was another impressive display of control and containment.
I just sometimes think… come on, it’s a GAME isn’t it? Supposed to be fun? Yes, ok, so committing men forward also risks leaving gaps at the back, but I’d like to see us take a risk and go for it a bit just sometimes. It needn’t be reckless, but when there’s the chance to counter attack in numbers with five minutes left, we should do it. Spurs were woeful in the second half today, and who knows, maybe they were there for the taking if we’d been a bit more daring when the opportunities presented themselves.
Don’t get me wrong – Roy is doing a great job and I’m very happy with our points tally, etc. But can I take sitting through another ten 0-0s on the road this season? Not sure. Hey hum. We’ve got a great chance against Chelsea – COYW!
PS. Oh and a big well done to Chris Baird – great performance.
PPS. And well done on your win, Rich!
Comment by JamieR — December 26, 2008 @ 8:15 pm |
It’s Roy the Italian though isn’t it, Jamie? He is, to all intents and purposes, an Italian manager, I’m convinced of that, so for him the result is everything. Which you can understand, as lots of managers this year are showing that getting results is not easy to do. It’s nice that we have one who can get them, albeit in a negative way. I know what you mean, but hopefully we’ll continue to open up at home and halfway satisfy folk.
Comment by rich — December 26, 2008 @ 8:22 pm |
FYI, Part 2 of the ESPN Dempsey interview is now up:
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/columns/story?id=605247&sec=americansabroad&root=americansabroad&cc=5901
Comment by Ilya — December 26, 2008 @ 8:24 pm |
Did anyone else notice Etuhu’s ineptness on offense? Besides the shot he took, he was really just standing around occupying space that Murphy wanted to run into. Hence no offensive flow and possession in the second half.
Granted it was Etuhu’s first real action, but maybe losing Bullard will be such a big deal after all…
Comment by timmyg — December 26, 2008 @ 8:55 pm |
While I’m not one to get excited about another nil-nil draw, it’s another point earned on the road and we shouldn’t overlook that. And to keep a clean sheet w/o our best defender made it even more enjoyable.
Watching us without Bullard made me realize how hard he works to make himself available for the ball. Sure, it can be annoying to watch at times to watch him come back to exchange five yard passes with the fullback, but I realized how important this can be when we build up into attack. I found that by not having him as an outlet, many of our attacking players struggled with where to go with their next pass. I haven’t heard how long he will be out for, but I would have to imagine it’s at least a few weeks so we’ll have to adjust. Perhaps this will be a blessing in disguise as the transfer talk could finally settle down.
With a very short turnaround, I would be very surprised if Murphy is able to go the full 90 on Sunday. If so, we will likely get a look at dual holding mids with Etuhu and Andreasson partnering in central midfield. Should be interesting.
I thought Davies had an especially poor match. He really seemed to struggle with the accurancy and pace of his passes (although his through ball to AJ was well done). Martin Tyler mentioned in the beginning of the match that while the pitch looked good, it was rather bumpy so perhaps that had something to do with it.
Is it me or does AJ seem to be about a step slow lately? He never seems to be able to separate from his defender. When Davies put him through on goal late in the match, King was still able to catch him and put him off.
I noticed this during the Boro match, but failed to mention it. Paintsil seems to be really struggling now. He looks out of sync with the rest of the side and you see a lot more negative interaction between him and everyone else. Right at the beginning of the match, he misplaced a pass to Murphy and they seemed to have a verbal exchange about it. Wouldn’t be surprised if we see Stoor soon.
Lastly, nice to see the rehabilitation of Chris Baird continue. He played really well which was nice to see.
Comment by George H — December 26, 2008 @ 9:18 pm |
Good post, George. And I agree about Johnson, it occurs to me that he’s followed the Michael Owen career path somewhat, only he’s not as good. That still makes him an asset for us, but he hasn’t added the craft that Owen has in his slower years. Shame, but fortunately there’s more to his game than pace (which has been a nice surprise).
Timmy – come on, you know how I get with these black/white statements. Inept? That’s very harsh. He did struggle to find the pace of the game at first, but after about 10 mins of the second half I thought he got going and did alright. His touch was nice and his passing was very crisp, weighted everything perfectly. That side of things was good to see. I didn’t think he did as much as he might have defensively – a couple of times Spurs players ran straight through us – but again, the likes of Modric, Zokora and Jenas are outstanding players and it’s going to take him time to get used to playing with them.
I’d say it was an encouraging debut. For us to lose the player who does most of our attacking was always going to be a blow, the fact that Etuhu isn’t Jimmy Bullard isn’t his fault. You’d be better off wondering why Simon Davies didn’t step up.
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 26, 2008 @ 9:37 pm |
Perhaps I’m just interested in results as well, but I’m pleased at this one — even though I forecast a 0-2 win for us elsewhere in the universe. When I saw the mood Lennon was in early on, I thought that Konchesky was going to really have his head straight. He did, and in spades. That tackle in the penalty area was cherce. I’ve not been so much in love with The Alien since he got himself sent off at home v. Derby last season, but he really showed me something today.
Finally, I was accused of being hopelessly positive when I expressed faith in Baird at CB. I thought he had a fine performance today, and I hope the fans at CC don’t jump on him the first time he loses possession. Roy has brought him along very well.
Finally [1] according to one match report I’ve read, Bully won’t be on the pitch against Chelsea.
Finally [2] BBC’s match report included their MOM. I tuned in to see if it was Gomes, Schwarzer, Baird, or Konchesky. Instead — just as it was in our victory over them at home — Luka Modric, with a very high point total. I don’t understand all this love for a guy who, according to the irrepressible Gentleman Jim, looks like a 16-year-old girl.
Thanks for the report and comments.
Comment by HatterDon — December 26, 2008 @ 10:09 pm |
weltmeisterclaude:
Okay, perhaps inept was a bit harsh. But there were several moments later in the game when Davies — who also had a TERRIBLE game — had the ball near the sideline, and was looking to pass the ball to Etuhu. Yet Dickson was just standing there as if saying “Sorry, but, where should I go again?” and ruined the flow. And several times Murphy was about to cut into space, but Etuhu just stood there and occupied the space instead on clearing out or switching with Murphy.
Its not like he was passing to the opposition or giving possession away on a whim. But seeing the offense try to operate with him out there made me fully realize just how vital Bullard is. Which is more what I was getting at.
Comment by timmyg — December 26, 2008 @ 10:44 pm |
I watched the whole game via the net. Didn’t think it was too bad a match. Interesting the comments from the commentators. They really emphasised how organised Fulham are now. Big contrast to only 12 months ago – a reminder of how far we have come in a short time. Also raved about Chris Baird’s performance – Roy must have done a great job inside Chris’s head, and I suppose playing him in his best position helps. I suspect that if JB is out for the Chelski match, that Andreasson will come in, rather than Etuhu. I reckon Roy put Etuho on with an eye to holding the draw. Didn’t notice him much, which is both good and bad. Finally, I think the result is a testament to Roy’s SYSTEM – it’s not totally dependent on one or two individuals – it still works when you mix and match a few players.
Comment by Mike H — December 27, 2008 @ 1:59 am |
Mike – totally, that’s the system at work isn’t it? A few of us had suggested before that, for odd games at least, we could probably survive without HAngeland or Bullard, although I had expected to see Tony Kallio out there (aerial work). That Baird came in like that and did so well is a credit to him, first of all, but also to our manager and to the system he has implemented.
Comment by rich — December 27, 2008 @ 11:16 am |
Don, I reckon Baird’ll be alright. Nobody could deny that he played well yesterday, very well (he even looked good on the ball!) and I think the good run has removed a lot of the negativity from the Cottage. He might get the odd murmur – people are like that – but I think most people will welcome him if he has to play on Sunday. As – it has to be said – will Didier Drogba… gulp.
Comment by rich — December 27, 2008 @ 11:20 am |
Modric had me shitting myself to be honest. He and Lennon looked like they might make something happen whenever they attacked. It might be because I was sitting close to the Konchesky zone in the second half, but those two and Korluka weren’t half frightening from close range. We did really well keeping them to snap shots.
Comment by rich — December 27, 2008 @ 11:23 am |
The one thing I’m thankful for, from Lennon, was that his crossing was atrocious. His dribbling was there, and he turned us inside out on more than one occasion… but the last shot/cross was USUALLY lacking.
It’s a shame Dempsey faded… if you look at our depth right now, beyond the starting lineup, there’s not a tremendous amount of creativity in midfield, at least while Gera is out.
Andreason, even though he can occasionally let a shot rip, and Etuhu (from what I know) are d-mids, by trade… same with Andranik, who’s hurt as well. Who knows what’s there in Gray?
That being said, I’ll take the point missing the two biggest influences on the team. I wish I was more familiar with Etuhu’s game.
Comment by El Steve — December 27, 2008 @ 3:33 pm |
Etuhu supposedly has it in him to play a Viera role, but obviously that’s asking an awful lot. I can see that he might be able to do a bit of everything when he’s going well though, I liked his passing and touch, and he certainly caught that shot well. He’s a project, to borrow a baseball term.
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 27, 2008 @ 4:09 pm |
One positive thing — we have point #25 on Boxing day this year. We got point number 25 last year after the away win at Reading in April. I’ll take that!
Comment by SteveM19 — December 28, 2008 @ 12:41 am |