A thrilling derby in which Clint Dempsey and Frank Lampard scored two goals each.
Fulham went ahead early on. Simon Davies – restored to dead ball duties in Jimmy Bullard’s absence – bent in a wicked cross from the left flank which Dempsey flipped into the net from a yard out. How the ball made its way so far without being cleared was something of a mystery, but without John Terry the Chelsea defence seemed half-vulnerable all day. It was a typical piece of opportunism from Dempsey, and a fantastic start to the game.
Chelsea – who let’s remember, have an astonishing away record this year – responded aggressively, coming close on a number of occasions. Didier Drogba was intensely physical and the whites were struggling to contain him. Things got worse, Anelka being introduced for the injured Malouda. Anelka’s first act was to smash a shot from distance that Mark Schwarzer *just* kept out, possibly with his elbow. Perhaps the hardest hit shot we’ve seen at the Cottage this year. Frank Lampard belted the ball goalwards but Schwarzer stopped that one too. Chelsea had a series of corners, but could not find a way through. Fulham – pegged back but remarkably assured – went in a goal up.
Then followed a whirlwhind of attacking football. Local rivalry or not, sometimes you have to tip your hat; Chelsea were very good. Their formation effectively became a 2-1-4-3, with two centre-backs protected by the impressive Mikel, Bosingwa and Cole flying down the wings, Lampard and Deco pulling strings from all over the place, and Anelka, Drogbda and Cole/Kalou making merry up front. It was an absolute onslaught and it paid off straight away, Drogba breaking clear (a possible hand-ball?), turning the back infield, then…. a mixup? The ball fell loose to Lampard who converted the open goal.
They didn’t stop there, and for a time Fulham were reduced to lamping long balls as far as they could to try to get a breather. A harsh free-kick was awarded, Lampard stepped up, sent a piledriver through from distance, and bang! in it went. Did it skip off the turf? Take a deflection? The Fulham players looked stunned. The early goal was now a distant memory, and we hadn’t troubled Petr Cech since. The fear was that we might be buried.
But Hodgson’s team are made of stern stuff, and straightaway the Whites pulled themselves together. John Paintsil made a point of geeing up his colleagues, reminding them that this was far from over. Good man, heads were sinking. Simon Davies – who had a fine game at last – reasserted himself, Dempsey and Paintsil resumed their battle with Ashley Cole down the right, and we had a game on again. Murphy attacked, got caught upfield, but who was covering for him? Andy Johnson! Smart play, selfless play. We still needed a goal though. Zamora made way for Nevland, Andreasen came on for Etuhu (who had a fair first start), and back we went. Time running out, a corner on the right, that man Davies whips it in, and up, up goes Clint Dempsey. The ball spins goalwards! It’s in! It’s bloody in! Dempsey rips his shirt off in delight, sprinting towards the Hammy End. When the euphoria dies down the referee, apologetically, shows him a yellow card.
Post script: under the Johnny Haynes Stand, Mens toilets. An early leaver has returned, panicked: “who scored?” he implores. The Times’ legendary football writer Brian Glanville emerges from the toilet: “Dempsey, header” he declares, firmly but with some pleasure. “Dempsey, header” indeed. What a day.



I’m sure most of you’ve heard by now but everyone seems to reporting that were in for a player named Kagiso Dikgacoi from South Africa. He claims that Roy was after him last summer but couldn’t get the papers done. Now everything is falling into place for the work permit according to the 24 year old Dikgacoi who plays midfield and is captain of his current squad.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=605413&sec=england&cc=5901
Not a lot more information here but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kagiso_Dikgacoi
Comment by bq — December 28, 2008 @ 2:13 pm |
Fulham manager Roy Hodgson:
“It was a fantastic fighting effort. Over 90 minutes Chelsea were the better footballing team, but we matched them in so many departments. In the second half Chelsea played really well and deserved to go 2-1 up. But credit to our players, they didn’t lose their heads and they managed to score a wonderful late equaliser.”
Comment by bq — December 28, 2008 @ 5:24 pm |
I’m thrilled that Clint Dempsey scored both goals. After his questionable second half on boxing day, he needed a great performance today.
I just got my home Dempsey shirt on Christmas Day too :)
Comment by Adam S. — December 28, 2008 @ 5:29 pm |
Wahoo! Clint Dempsey eh! Feels like a win after they battered us for so long, great effort from everyone.
Comment by Chopper — December 28, 2008 @ 5:46 pm |
I was dancing around my living room yelling “Hughes! Hughes!” and my wife asks “Why has Clint taken off his shirt?” It was only then that I realized that Clint beat not only Chelsea’s defenders, but also ours to get the critical goal.
I’m telling you, with this side if there’s a goal to be gotten in the 80+ minute, it is more likely to be us scoring it.
We definitely stole a point today. Did someone say we haven’t lost since early November?
Comment by HatterDon — December 28, 2008 @ 6:21 pm |
I had to play a hockey game this morning, so I missed the second half… called a friend up for an update and he’s like, WE DREW, IT WAS AWESOME… DEMPSEY AT THE END.
Naturally, I was disappointed having left with the score 1-0 at half… but, the more I read it, the better it comes off.
Great to see Deuce with a pair of good goals… the first in a totally opportunistic spot, nice quick finish… the second just inspired.
Notice how much more dangerous we were on set pieces without Bullard taking them? They were few, but the ball in was generally dangerous from Davies.
We did miss him on attack, but maybe it’d do him some good to share a dead ball or two?
Comment by El Steve — December 28, 2008 @ 7:16 pm |
A brilliant point, well earned. Our passing and controlled game was knocked out of the park by their crisp and precise movement of the ball so we had, at times, to resort to sheers guts and endeavor.
i didn’t realise Clint’s second goal had gone in, I soon did when my son landed on top of me as I was halfway to sitting down!
A very, very impressive first half of the season
Comment by Bruno — December 28, 2008 @ 7:17 pm |
Awesome feeling nicking that point right at the death. Not sure linking to our websites is the thing to do here but my report is up at HammyEnd.com:
http://hammyend.com/?p=546
Comment by Dan — December 28, 2008 @ 7:31 pm |
I managed to get up this morning just in time to catch the match after only about four hours of sleep. I am SO glad I did as Clint was awesome on both goals. He looked dangerous at several other points in addition to hustling on defense when the Whites were defending a lead and then a draw before pushing higher while looking to net an equalizer.
Comment by Army of Dad — December 28, 2008 @ 7:58 pm |
if anyone can transcribe the post match interview (BBC or Sky) that would rule. Cheers!
Rich
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 28, 2008 @ 9:46 pm |
thing is, maybe we missed Bullard, but Chelsea attacked so much that without Etuhu we might’ve been buried. So swings and roundabouts.
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 28, 2008 @ 9:47 pm |
El Steve, Sir Roy made the same point re JB’s absence in his interview. Something like “what we might have gained going forward with Bullard, we might have lost going backwards”. He praised Etuhu and Murphy for their defensive work.
Comment by Mike H — December 28, 2008 @ 10:55 pm |
DEUCE!
Comment by Derek — December 28, 2008 @ 10:57 pm |
It was a fine day to be an American football fan. I want to thank you Brits for inventing the beautiful game. I’m happy that Clint has finally(?) been accepted at Fulham as he is a hard worker with just enough skill to bring it when it counts. Go Whites!
Comment by Kevin the American — December 28, 2008 @ 11:46 pm |
Good result against a very good chelsea side. Was a bit hacked off with scolari’s post match interview however:
“We had six, seven, eight chances to score and got two. They had two, from free-kicks, and scored twice.”
he completely ignores the fact that both the Chelsea goals had large slices of luck invovled considering our defensive solidity this year.
Loved Deuce today, typified how far we have come, from unmotivated, weak and unphysical last year to a strong team with a never say die attitude this year.
Comment by FulFan — December 28, 2008 @ 11:50 pm |
Been over the neighbours foor drinks – stil happy. He scores with his left, he scores with his riiiight! That boy Clint Dempsey makes Drogba look Shhhh….!
Comment by Chopper — December 29, 2008 @ 12:13 am |
bq, if you listen to Roy’s post match interview on the BBC, he effectively said the rumors for the South Africa bloke are just that, rumors. No interest to sign him, he already had his try out and was sent packing.
What a thrilling draw. I was genuinely saddened that Fat Frank had scored the go ahead goal, and the 1st one for that matter, which to me looked like it could have been a mistake by Mark, but Dempsey made up for it with a great header. Real nice end to the year.
Comment by RR — December 29, 2008 @ 2:23 am |
Just watched the match on DVR after being at my dad’s all day.
All I can say is “wow”. I feel exhausted from all of my yelling and screaming, my dog is still a little wary of me.
I felt like we were in a prize fight, taking a ton of body shots before earning the split decision.
I’m continually amazed at how many teams refuse to mark each post when defending a corner. It’s really reckless when you consider how much area the keeper needs to cover. If Chelsea had simply done that, Dempsey’s header would have likely been cleared.
For the people who were at the Cottage, how great was it to shut the Chelsea supporters up after Dempsey’s header?
Comment by George H — December 29, 2008 @ 2:29 am |
Absolutely wonderful. Who’d have thought a Yank would score 2 goals against one of Europe’s top sides? Way to go Deuce!
Comment by BC — December 29, 2008 @ 4:23 am |
Thanks for the clarification RR. Good to know and sounds as if Roy didn’t mince words.
Comment by bq — December 29, 2008 @ 4:23 am |
On reflection, I wonder if “the visitors” underestimated us. I’m no coach, but when in charge of schoolboy teams, I always made sure there was a man (well boy or girl actually) on each post for a corner. You would think that with a minute to go, when defending a one goal lead, it would have made sense for them to do the same. If they had, chances are Clint’s header would have been blocked. Complacency perhaps? Over-confidence? Laziness?
Comment by Mike H — December 29, 2008 @ 7:45 am |
Those were an interesting couple of games. Some things that I think we learnt (or that were fairly obvious before and have been clarified):
Bullard: We miss his energy and surprising control going forward, but not so much that it would be impossible to replace; just difficult. We really do not miss him taking set pieces.
Hangeland: Really impressive stuff from Baird against Spurs. Hangeland is clearly an awesome player but there was evidence there that the system rather than the man is key to our defensive record.
Dempsey/Gera: We’ve been saying this here for quite some time, but there really is a mysterious unquantifiable knack for scoring scrapping goals, and Dempsey’s got it. Give him even a little sniff and he’s all over it. Gera had clearer cut chances but doesn’t seem to have the cheek — or whatever it is — to put them away. It’s so bizarre football.
Big Phil: I really like him. Next to our Roy he’s the nicest guy managing out there. Long may he stay in the Premiership.
Comment by rjbiii — December 29, 2008 @ 10:35 am |
Agree with the last poster’s “clarifications” with this proviso about Dempsey. Until recently he has had a strong record of getting into position to score, but only a mediocre conversion rate.
Finishing apart, he’s upped his game since getting back into the team. If he can in addition sustain improvement in taking chances, then he becomes our Tim Cahill and not just our potential Tim Cahill.
Comment by b+w geezer — December 29, 2008 @ 11:11 am |
I agree, but equally I don’t know that Gera’s misses are evidence that he can’t score chances, just that he didn’t. These things can go in phases, and Clint did, after all, put a few away last year while he was missing some. It happens to a lot of forwards, and the gift is to get into the positions in the first place.
Both have the nous/sixth sense to get into the important positions and, if you do that often enough you’ll get goals. As Gera himself notes in the programme yesterday, he could’ve had five of six this year already, and I don’t know that it’s *necessarily* a shortcoming of his that he hasn’t scored those: he really has come very close.
The Cahill comparison is decent isn’t it, although perhaps Dempsey’s all around game is better (defensively, etc), while perhaps he’ll never get all the Cahill goals. But I do remember the original YouTube compilation after we signed him, and all his goals were bundled in the same way we’ve seen him score since he’s been here. It’s one of the reasons I’ve been so bullish on him: those instincts will work against most defences too because the hardest thing to defend against is a late run by someone with a feel for where the ball will drop (David Platt made an entire career out of this). Nice to see him on target again yesterday, and long may it continue.
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 29, 2008 @ 12:00 pm |
Big Phil a nice guy?? The same guy that took a swing at Drago when he was managing Portugal?
Rjbii, you must be confusing him with the real Gene Hackman;)
Comment by George H — December 29, 2008 @ 1:58 pm |
On Dempsey, and this may have been written about elsewhere but, the thing is, I think his game has improved because he was left out early. My sense is Hodgson knew, somehow, by making the squad ’settled’ he would force the peripheral players to ‘up their game’ in order to get a sniff or a taste. Hodgson training ground focus of working on things over and over has been good for Dempsey as well as all the players. This probably was the perfect medicine for a guy like Dempsey. He seems, just a tad more active this year, stays in position when necessary, better defensively and he also seems to have improved his crossing accuracy. One thing is for sure, his confidence is high and lets hope he remains hungry and fully understands he needs to continue to play well for Hodgson.
Comment by RR — December 29, 2008 @ 4:46 pm |
So it wasn’t just the group of us watching in NYC who think he looks like Hackman, then?
Comment by Josh — December 29, 2008 @ 4:50 pm |
I’m thrilled with the result. Last season, we would have lost this game, but this year, despite the fact that we were out played for much of the match, the boys never quit.
Dempsey is really turning into a special player who continues to gain confidence. That will not only be huge for Fulham, but for the US National Team as well as the final stage of qualifying gets under way in February.
Comment by Jason Gatties — December 29, 2008 @ 4:50 pm |
Here’s a question. I’m not sold on Zamora. He seems to lose the ball every time it comes to him. Would the team be better served with Dempsey and Johnson up top? Clint did a decent job last year at lone forward with zero service.
I thought Clint definitely got the better of Ashley Cole yesterday.
Comment by Derek — December 29, 2008 @ 5:16 pm |
He normally doesn’t (lose the ball every time it comes to him). Clint did a reasonable fill-in job for the first part of the Middlesborough match, but both his and the overall performance improved when Zamora came on and he could revert to wide right.
Comment by b+w geezer — December 29, 2008 @ 5:59 pm |
I would rather find another striker to push Zamora up front rather than move Dempsey. Leave Dempsey be and he’ll continue to play well.
Comment by Jason Gatties — December 29, 2008 @ 5:59 pm |
Zamora was not his best yesterday but I agree the entire teams play picked up when he came on against Mboro as B+W mentions. He adds more than he takes away.
Comment by RR — December 29, 2008 @ 6:19 pm |
Zamora’s been about as good as a forward with one goal in 16 games can be really. Some of his play has been fantastic. Not always, but his good games have been many, and he and Johnson seem to work well together.
We really mustn’t lose sight of the fact that we were up against a very, very good team yesterday.
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 29, 2008 @ 6:37 pm |
I thought Zamora did an admirable job in holding up the ball yesterday, considering how stretched the game was. Most of the time, he had no outlet to go to with 2-3 Chelsea defenders swarming him each time.
You also have to take into account the sheer physicality of the Chelsea players. Zamora is a pretty sturdy player in his own right, but pales in comparison when you match him up against the likes of Alex, Carvalho, Ivanovic and Mikel.
On average, our side looked like midgets compared to Chelsea.
Comment by George H — December 29, 2008 @ 6:47 pm |
also it seemed like there were many more of them than us.
One of my cherished memories of my grandmother (long gone, sadly), was her football commentary.
We watched a Man Utd game on TV together once, early eighties I expect, and they were dominating someone, Sheffield WEdnesday or Forest probably.
“That team have more players, Rich. It isn’t fair.”
“They both have eleven players, granny, I’m sure.”
“Well if they both have eleven, how come.. no, they haven’t, the red team have more players. Watch, it’s obvious. Wherever the ball is there’s a red player. The others are running around because there aren’t enough of them.”
“No, I think it’s eleven v eleven”
“well if you say so”
It was a bit like that for us sometimes, wasn’t it?
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — December 29, 2008 @ 7:24 pm |
Yes, it did seem like we were down a man or two for most of the match.
When I was watching some of our players during the beginning of the second half, I was wondering how many of them were going to be able to finish the match. They were doing so much running, they looked gassed.
BTW, since we scored off the resulting corner, they never showed the replay where it looked like Cashley Cole handled the ball in the box. Did anyone seated in the Hammersmith stand get a good look at that sequence (Chopper?)
Lastly, I noticed that before Davies took that corner, he motioned to our players in the box to come towards him. Since Dempsey’s header occured at the far post, I wonder how many players moved closer to the near post after seeing Davies’ signal.
Comment by George H — December 29, 2008 @ 7:46 pm |
Re-Zamora — I’ve never seen Johnson and Zamora look less likely to ruffle a defender’s hair — never mind score — than yesterday. Having said that, Chelsea may have the best team defense in all of Europe. We put two goals past them, so I guess it would be petty of me to expect one more from each of our strikers.
I think we keep Zamora/Johnson up front as long as they rattle the more mortal defenders of the rest of the league. I WOULD like to see Eddie Johnson recalled from Cardiff. I think that he is a more viable replacement for Zamora than is Nevland. He can also play in the AJ role. Eddie has his limitations, but if he’s going to sit on the bench, I’d rather he do it here and learn a thing or two from Roy on the training ground in the process.
Those of us who know EJ’s history well know that he’s incredibly frustrating, but, once that first goal goes in, the next few come in a hurry.
Not to change the subject, but damn! We are a fine side aren’t we?
Comment by HatterDon — December 29, 2008 @ 8:23 pm |
Yes, indeed we are! I’m going to enjoy it while it lasts (which is hopefully several seasons at the least).
I hope we get another quality striker in the Jan or summer transfer window. I don’t think EJ is a viable alternative. He’s not consistent enough. Maybe with time, he’ll improve, but for the near future, he’s reserve squad at best.
Comment by BC — December 29, 2008 @ 9:20 pm |
This is the 39th response to this thread. Is that a record?
Comment by HatterDon — December 30, 2008 @ 12:15 am |
No, your wrong HatterDon. It’s the 40th response. Ha!
Rich, love the story of your grandmother. I just had a discussion with someone the other day about this very thing. Teams that are well fit and have incredibly fluid movement off the ball, always seem to look like there’s an extra player or two on the field. Especially teams that transition quickly either way. Of course the team also needs to have the skill to hold the ball when they have possession as well, and Chelsea certainly have that skill.
Comment by bq — December 30, 2008 @ 1:01 pm |
Yep, this is a record for comments on a post!
Comment by weltmeisterclaude — January 1, 2009 @ 4:51 pm |