Craven Cottage Newsround

Strange ideas about Fulham since 2006

Clear and simple as the truth

 

11 Comments on “Clear and simple as the truth

  1. barney
    February 1, 2012

    oh right thats that then.

    havent felt this let down and dejected since we sold barry hayles

  2. Nick Johnson
    February 1, 2012

    This has a Jimmy Bullard feeling about it. A player who has been a king-pin of our squad, both as a player and a personality. He is now past 30, a bit injury prone (not as seriously as Bullard) and is no longer on the same wavelength as the manager.

    It doesn’t matter where he has gone, the question is have Fulham done the right thing? From a business point of view, probably yes. For Jol to get the team playing his way, yes. For the team’s morale and performance level? That depends on his replacement. I have been as jittery as anyone about how we cope without Zamora, just as I feared, wrongly as it turned out, about how we would cope without Bullard.

    If Pogrebnyak can find his feet quickly we’ll be OK. Maybe Trotta will also get his chance. This time last year we were just turning the corner, so our present position is similar.

  3. AlexL
    February 1, 2012

    I think it boils down to this:

    Success – we stay up this season
    Failure – we get relegated

    As mentioned above, the similarities with Bullard are interesting. At th end of the season, if we are still in the prem, with the chance to buy a young striker or two, having gotten rid of two of our highest earners and oldest players? That is pretty good business. We have to stay up first though, which now revolves completely around whether or not Dembele can stay fit. If he can, I predict some sexy football, if not, we end up looking like the first half against newcastle.

  4. Toby
    February 1, 2012

    I suppose we can only sit and watch to see if the ‘Martin Jol project’ is going to work out. I just don’t know if I’ve seen any real evidence that he’s got the abilities which were suggested when he arrived.

    • Eddie
      February 1, 2012

      “The Martin Jol Project” can only really be properly judged next season. He is making several big changes, and this coming summer will be crucial, both on and off the pitch (training and transfers).

      I’m optimistic, and I think we will be far more consistent next season, once his philosophy is properly imposed on the team.

  5. bruno
    February 1, 2012

    I am not too bothered by this transfer. I haven’t got the facts but I am sure his on pitch time is actually really small in compared to your average striker due to injuries, attitude or whatever reason. The plain fact is he did not want to be there, it was all degrees of dissatisfaction rather than joy. I just can’t believe the new player who has been capped 30 times for a major team will be that much worst, I mean he will be better than Elm won’t he?? And he wasn’t that bad. One thing for sure, we won’t miss his goals. Also I looking forward to not hearing the guy sitting next to me moaning and groaning all through the game.

  6. Spiny Norman
    February 1, 2012

    Bobby Zamora. In 40+ years supporting Fulham I don’t recall another player who had such difficulty doing the simple things one minute, and yet could be sublimely brilliant the next. But the first half v Newcastle was the final straw for me – how many times was he caught offside? He couldn’t be arsed to make any effort, and in the end he just didn’t want to play for us any more.

  7. tim
    February 1, 2012

    QPR can have him. He seemed like a prick, and barely seemed to care this year. Let’s move on.

  8. George H
    February 1, 2012

    Disappointed that we sold him so late in the window, but I’m sure that was due to either trying to work something out for him to stay or to get QPR’s price to a decent level.

    Saw an interview with Zamora a couple of months ago and when the interviewer asked him what he does to stay fit (as far as diet, etc.), Zamora’s response was that he did nothing. Didn’t watch what he ate and hasn’t changed his habits since he was younger. That didn’t seem very professional to me and would be a red flag for a player who’s 31 and on a huge salary.

    I think that this deal will hurt us in the short term, but in the long run, we’ll view this as a positive development (much like the Bullard deal whose salary became an albatross to both Hull and Ipswich).

    • rjbiii
      February 1, 2012

      Interesting to read that QPR only gave him a 2.5 year contract. Bullard got a 4.5 year one, at about the same wages, and was only about ten months younger then than Zamora is now. So, at the very least, QPR have show some restraint here and Zamora hasn’t quite got the contract that I’m sure he was hoping for.

  9. George H
    February 1, 2012

    Good point, rjbiii. I didn’t realize that Zamora “only” upped his wages by 5k per week.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 1, 2012 by in General.

Say hello

email: claude.wormbridge at gmail.com

Archives

Winner! 2009 Best Blog at the New Football Pools Fanzine Awards

FFC Banner

When Football Was Football: Fulham

Rich's first book. Buy it from all the usual places, including now the club shop!

Buy the Fulham Review!

Fifth annual book out now.!

Or check Amazon for Kindle editions at amazing prices!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 520 other followers