Oooh, this is interesting.  Colin Baker was onto this kind of thing a while ago (and his stats in the Fulham Review already consider factors such as shot difficulty) but here’s a good look at how number work is growing.

Here’s a bit I like:

The image below shows the location – and goal probability – of the goals conceded by De Gea (red) and Robinson (blue). The tiny size of many of the circles/shots conceded by Robinson highlights an apparent weakness when facing efforts from distance.

I have literally been saying this for years: Paul Robinson is a terrible ‘keeper (who does well against Fulham!).  That he is consistently the easiest goalkeeper to beat in the league makes a mockery of his one-time status as England’s number one.

The issue I have with the shooting stats (e.g. Rooney, Dempsey, VP comps) is that Rooney’s probably shooting on the end of quicksilver breakaways using flanks and swift ball movement, while Dempsey’s shooting on the end of slow buildups where we’ve tried to walk the ball through the middle of the pitch.  So I don’t know that merely looking at shot location is a fair comp.  But I suppose it’s all we have for now.



One thought on “Optastuff

  1. I have a theory – the reason that Clint has been more successful this season is because we have improved out ability to break away, and as the season has progressed, have also used the width of the pitch better. Thus, Dempsey gets more Rooneyesque shots off this year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s