This looks at points per game depending on how Kit Symons changed his team. So in games where we were unchanged under Symons Fulham averaged 0.7 points per game. In games where we made 1-2 changes we averaged twice as many points. In games where he made three changes we did better yet, averaging 1.7 points.
I doubt that the differences between the top bars are significant, but there’s something afoot at the bottom. The same applies when we look at performance v expectation (per previous posts): with no changes the team does worse against opponents than you might hope. When he made 1-3 changes the team did okay. (this time, an overhaul caused us to underperform slightly).
Put in language that people might understand, we were unchanged seven times and only won once, 3-2 against a Forest team which pretty much battered us.
In our best games, Bettinelli, Bodurov, Staflylidis, LVC, Parker, Ruiz, McCormack played in all.
I don’t think this has really helped much.